milli260876 wrote:Apple didn't make game changing products....
they made pretty ones that people with limited intelligence could use
In a market where "cheap cheap cheap" is the mantra, Apple chose to use more expensive hardware and then throw a world-class support system behind them.
And you know what? The market responded. People who want the results of the technology without caring a thing about the nuts and bolts, buy Apple stuff like crazy.
And people who want the results and have had their fill of twiddling and fiddling and building their own, responded. Are they of limited intelligence? Nope. They just have BETTER THINGS TO DO WITH THEIR LIVES than twiddle and fiddle.*
Those who live to twiddle and fiddle, cannot grasp it when others don't. I leave the reader to his own conclusions.
*I see similar things on Jalopnik and the like, where people who love to twiddle and fiddle with cars simply refuse to acknowledge the HUGE market of people who are happy that cars have become appliances that just work. For some reason, the existence of that market somehow invalidates their own existence. It's almost as if for the twiddlers to "win", the appliance people must *not*. Must not exist. Must not be allowed to have appliances, must be forced to twiddle and fiddle on cars. Similarly for computer people. Somehow, the existence of appliance-level computers that just work and allow ordinary people to do amazing things, and for which there is an utterly astounding worldwide support organization in place, is a complete and total threat to the existence of those who want to fiddle and twiddle and do it on their own.
Go on out there and find anything remotely close to the Apple Store and the Genius Bar. A closely-held ecosystem can be *tremendously* profitable.