XBMC 12 - support CableCard

Troubleshoot and discuss the XBOX 360, XBOX One, Linksys, and other extenders.
Post Reply
User avatar
Dean L. Surkin

Posts: 158
Joined: Fri Sep 07, 2012 5:56 pm
Location:

HTPC Specs: Show details

XBMC 12 - support CableCard

#1

Post by Dean L. Surkin » Wed Jan 30, 2013 5:28 pm

On Engadget, I saw a comment saying that the new version of XBMC supports CableCard and the HD HomeRun Prime. I have not yet tried to confirm this, but if true, it has great implications for the (non)future of WMC and the future of the Echo.

[update] I did a little checking around, and it seems that XBMC supports CableCard tuners for live TV and for copy-freely flagged programs, but not for the kind of copy-protected programs that WMC does. All in all, false alarm.
Dean L. Surkin

Sammy2

Posts: 1708
Joined: Fri Aug 24, 2012 7:35 pm
Location:

HTPC Specs: Show details

#2

Post by Sammy2 » Wed Jan 30, 2013 5:47 pm

There is no support yet for copy once material outside WMC. That said I don't think it will be too long before it is using DCTP-IP. I would think that ceton would want to jump on that with the echo running android to strech its legs a little longer in the market.

foxwood

Posts: 1761
Joined: Fri Sep 07, 2012 3:43 pm
Location:

HTPC Specs: Show details

#3

Post by foxwood » Wed Jan 30, 2013 5:57 pm

Sammy2 wrote:There is no support yet for copy once material outside WMC. That said I don't think it will be too long before it is using DCTP-IP.
I'm willing to bet $10 that the PS3 will be still be the only DTCP-IP hardware client that you can walk into a major retailer and buy in January, 2014. You're not going to see it in any FOSS project either, for much the same reason that nobody has stumped up for a PlayReady license for XBMC or any other FOSS client.

(There's an outside chance that Sony might add DTCP-IP to some of their BluRay players, but beyond that? I don't see it).

foxwood

Posts: 1761
Joined: Fri Sep 07, 2012 3:43 pm
Location:

HTPC Specs: Show details

#4

Post by foxwood » Wed Jan 30, 2013 6:01 pm

Dean L. Surkin wrote:On Engadget, I saw a comment saying that the new version of XBMC supports CableCard and the HD HomeRun Prime.
I should point out that Ceton provides Linux drivers for the InfiniTV and that XBMC users have been using the InfiniTV for some time (though they need to use a cable-provider that doesn't slap extraneous Copy restrictions on most of their content).

Sammy2

Posts: 1708
Joined: Fri Aug 24, 2012 7:35 pm
Location:

HTPC Specs: Show details

#5

Post by Sammy2 » Wed Jan 30, 2013 6:04 pm

foxwood wrote:
Sammy2 wrote:There is no support yet for copy once material outside WMC. That said I don't think it will be too long before it is using DCTP-IP.
I'm willing to bet $10 that the PS3 will be still be the only DTCP-IP hardware client that you can walk into a major retailer and buy in January, 2014. You're not going to see it in any FOSS project either, for much the same reason that nobody has stumped up for a PlayReady license for XBMC or any other FOSS client.

(There's an outside chance that Sony might add DTCP-IP to some of their BluRay players, but beyond that? I don't see it).
I'm sorry. By "it" I actually meant the echo, not XBMC. It is more likely that the echo will support DCTP-IP than XBMC as supporting it and also implementing DLNA into their own tuners, ceton can extend (no pun) the echo beyond the Windows environment where M$ has inadvertently or purposefully locked the gate to the garden wall.

Sammy2

Posts: 1708
Joined: Fri Aug 24, 2012 7:35 pm
Location:

HTPC Specs: Show details

#6

Post by Sammy2 » Wed Jan 30, 2013 6:06 pm

foxwood wrote:
Dean L. Surkin wrote:On Engadget, I saw a comment saying that the new version of XBMC supports CableCard and the HD HomeRun Prime.
I should point out that Ceton provides Linux drivers for the InfiniTV and that XBMC users have been using the InfiniTV for some time (though they need to use a cable-provider that doesn't slap extraneous Copy restrictions on most of their content).
That's good for expanded basic in Charterland but I have their "digi-tier" packages for things like sports, palladia, HDNet, Universal, etc. I don't have any of the typical premiums like HBO and the like but the line-up in the digi-tier packages is copy once.

foxwood

Posts: 1761
Joined: Fri Sep 07, 2012 3:43 pm
Location:

HTPC Specs: Show details

#7

Post by foxwood » Wed Jan 30, 2013 6:13 pm

Sammy2 wrote:I'm sorry. By "it" I actually meant the echo, not XBMC. It is more likely that the echo will support DCTP-IP than XBMC as supporting it and also implementing DLNA into their own tuners, ceton can extend (no pun) the echo beyond the Windows environment where M$ has inadvertently or purposefully locked the gate to the garden wall.
So your suggestion is that Ceton should add a feature to their Echo hardware so that a rivals company will be better able to sell a feature that is only of value on paper at the moment, and in doing so make their own tuner less attractive?

Yeah, that sounds like a winner. Not!

foxwood

Posts: 1761
Joined: Fri Sep 07, 2012 3:43 pm
Location:

HTPC Specs: Show details

#8

Post by foxwood » Wed Jan 30, 2013 6:16 pm

Sammy2 wrote:That's good for expanded basic in Charterland but I have their "digi-tier" packages for things like sports, palladia, HDNet, Universal, etc. I don't have any of the typical premiums like HBO and the like but the line-up in the digi-tier packages is copy once.
Well apparently, that's not a problem for XBMC users, because if it was, they'd be WMC users, wouldn't they :D

Sammy2

Posts: 1708
Joined: Fri Aug 24, 2012 7:35 pm
Location:

HTPC Specs: Show details

#9

Post by Sammy2 » Wed Jan 30, 2013 6:36 pm

foxwood wrote:
Sammy2 wrote:I'm sorry. By "it" I actually meant the echo, not XBMC. It is more likely that the echo will support DCTP-IP than XBMC as supporting it and also implementing DLNA into their own tuners, ceton can extend (no pun) the echo beyond the Windows environment where M$ has inadvertently or purposefully locked the gate to the garden wall.
So your suggestion is that Ceton should add a feature to their Echo hardware so that a rivals company will be better able to sell a feature that is only of value on paper at the moment, and in doing so make their own tuner less attractive?

Yeah, that sounds like a winner. Not!
When this actually works It could sell more echos because they don't need to be inside the WMC walled garden. There is no reason that they cannot make this work in a new tuner or maybe via f/w in their existing tuners. Ceton is on the edge and SiliconDust follows behind either learning from their mistakes or doing something a little different like their project connect which came out after SiliconDust saw problems with going that route with the lack of Win8 support.

foxwood

Posts: 1761
Joined: Fri Sep 07, 2012 3:43 pm
Location:

HTPC Specs: Show details

#10

Post by foxwood » Wed Jan 30, 2013 7:50 pm

Sammy2 wrote:When this actually works It could sell more echos because they don't need to be inside the WMC walled garden.
Just how big a market do you think there is outside that walled garden - you can get a small "net-top" PC for not much more than the Echo that would deliver everything an Echo would, and more - except for the protected cable-card content that is only available inside that "walled garden".

And note that the "wall" that you talk about is provided by PlayReady, which is something that you can license from Microsoft. But there aren't any commercial solutions, other than WMC, because that market isn't big enough. DTCP-IP doesn't change that. You can't distribute a fully open-source client, because then anyone who wanted to could strip the DRM bits out, and if the source didn't care about whether the DRM was there or not, they wouldn't bother putting it in in the first place.

slowbiscuit

Posts: 386
Joined: Wed Jun 29, 2011 8:52 pm
Location: In the ATL

HTPC Specs: Show details

#11

Post by slowbiscuit » Wed Jan 30, 2013 8:14 pm

foxwood wrote:
Sammy2 wrote:There is no support yet for copy once material outside WMC. That said I don't think it will be too long before it is using DCTP-IP.
I'm willing to bet $10 that the PS3 will be still be the only DTCP-IP hardware client that you can walk into a major retailer and buy in January, 2014. You're not going to see it in any FOSS project either, for much the same reason that nobody has stumped up for a PlayReady license for XBMC or any other FOSS client.

(There's an outside chance that Sony might add DTCP-IP to some of their BluRay players, but beyond that? I don't see it).
According to Ben Drawbaugh (engadget reporter), many of the 2012 TVs have DTCP-IP built in because they support RVU. A number of Samsungs frex. I'll PM you my Paypal address. :D

http://www.silicondust.com/forum2/viewt ... 47&t=14318

I agree that it's a tough nut to crack for any open source dev team, and will probably never see the light of day on something like Myth on Linux.

foxwood

Posts: 1761
Joined: Fri Sep 07, 2012 3:43 pm
Location:

HTPC Specs: Show details

#12

Post by foxwood » Wed Jan 30, 2013 8:24 pm

slowbiscuit wrote:According to Ben Drawbaugh (engadget reporter), many of the 2012 TVs have DTCP-IP built in because they support RVU. A number of Samsungs frex. I'll PM you my Paypal address. :D
How many of these TVs have hard drives that can record encrypted content, so that you can watch it later? If all you can use it for is watching live TV, you might as well just use the cable-company's set-top box.

foxwood

Posts: 1761
Joined: Fri Sep 07, 2012 3:43 pm
Location:

HTPC Specs: Show details

#13

Post by foxwood » Wed Jan 30, 2013 8:42 pm

Doing some followup research of my own, it looks like DirecTVs "Genie" system might actually be using this technology, allowing the aforementioned TVs to be clients of a DirecTV "server". Which is probably a rather more restrictive "walled garden" than WMC will ever be, and doesn't seem to offer much of an opening for Silicon Dust.

What I can't find is whether DirecTVs C31 client is open enough to work with anything other than a DirecTV server. If it is, then it already does what you want the EWcho to do, for half the price.

slowbiscuit

Posts: 386
Joined: Wed Jun 29, 2011 8:52 pm
Location: In the ATL

HTPC Specs: Show details

#14

Post by slowbiscuit » Thu Jan 31, 2013 1:22 pm

foxwood wrote:
slowbiscuit wrote:According to Ben Drawbaugh (engadget reporter), many of the 2012 TVs have DTCP-IP built in because they support RVU. A number of Samsungs frex. I'll PM you my Paypal address. :D
How many of these TVs have hard drives that can record encrypted content, so that you can watch it later? If all you can use it for is watching live TV, you might as well just use the cable-company's set-top box.
Yeah, but that wasn't the bet you made. You still owe me $10, which you'll be able to afford because you don't have to rent an STB. :D

barnabas1969

Posts: 5738
Joined: Tue Jun 21, 2011 7:23 pm
Location: Titusville, Florida, USA

HTPC Specs: Show details

#15

Post by barnabas1969 » Fri Feb 01, 2013 5:38 am

EWcho? Was that intentional? If so, very funny. I like it.

Post Reply