NBC blocks recordings again
-
- Posts: 2893
- Joined: Sat Jun 11, 2011 2:31 pm
- Location:
- HTPC Specs:
Can the cable company actually explain, as did erkotz, why *their* box would record it while such recording is forbidden otherwise?
That still sounds skanky to me, and I guarantee TWC would not have had a "straight answer" for that at all.
That still sounds skanky to me, and I guarantee TWC would not have had a "straight answer" for that at all.
-
- Posts: 2623
- Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2011 3:15 am
- Location:
- HTPC Specs:
This has been answered multiple times. The CableLabs specification defines hosts as "commercially available consumer receivers and set-top terminals" (as defined in chapter 1 of "CableCARD Interface 2.0 Specification"...it should be noted that "Host" is defined in multiple CableLabs specifications, with slightly different wording in some specifications. However, all of the definitions contain the same core concept: A host is something that can be purchased at retail by a regular consumer.) Cable boxes do not fit into this definition because they are not commercially available to consumers. Therefore, none of the copy protection rules apply to cable boxes. The copy protection rules only apply to devices that are commercially available to consumers.
-
- Posts: 2893
- Joined: Sat Jun 11, 2011 2:31 pm
- Location:
- HTPC Specs:
Richard, I understand that. We all do at this point.
Please go back to *my* point on this: TWC would NOT have given ANY sort of "straight answer" to any caller on why 7MC is forbidden to record a show while TWC boxes happily record it.
That was my entire point here. Please go back and read immediately prior posts. I was disputing that the cableco would have given a "straight answer" to that very reasonable question.
Please go back to *my* point on this: TWC would NOT have given ANY sort of "straight answer" to any caller on why 7MC is forbidden to record a show while TWC boxes happily record it.
That was my entire point here. Please go back and read immediately prior posts. I was disputing that the cableco would have given a "straight answer" to that very reasonable question.
-
- Posts: 2623
- Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2011 3:15 am
- Location:
- HTPC Specs:
You must be assuming that someone at TWC actually knows the answer.
-
- Posts: 2893
- Joined: Sat Jun 11, 2011 2:31 pm
- Location:
- HTPC Specs:
I'm only responding directly to what foxwood said:
We'd all prefer to get a straight answer, but in this case I highly doubt TWC would have one to offer. It would take coming to a place like this and asking someone like erkotz.None of us like dealing with the support people at the cable company, but I know that when I do, I prefer to get a straight answer rather than the run-around, even when the answer is No.
-
- Posts: 22
- Joined: Tue Apr 23, 2013 2:23 am
- Location:
- HTPC Specs:
I was immediately dismissed by time warner. First they told me that I need to complain to NBC. Then they told me that it was cetons fault and I should complain to them. In neither case did time warner take the the time to investigate, isolate or help to solve the problem IN THE SLIGHTEST WAY. Point the finger at somebody else and let the customer suffer. What leverage do I have with NBC? What leverage does time warner have with NBC? (HINT: I am only one small voice, twc probably has 750,000 subscribers in the greater Columbus area) Thank goodness for this forum and the level of support that ceton provides. Many have seen my setup, and everyone has asked if I can set one up for them. After this experience, I will give a 10 to ceton and recommend them 100%, time warner has been eliminated from the conversation.foxwood wrote:And in this case, what exactly could TWC have done for you? They did exactly what you paid them to do, delivering the signal from the TV station.
You can't expect TWC to troubleshoot Windows Media Center. I don't want to pay higher cable-card fees to pay for my cable company supporting end-user questions about problems with WMC.
None of us like dealing with the support people at the cable company, but I know that when I do, I prefer to get a straight answer rather than the run-around, even when the answer is No.
Sure, this time it wasn't twc's fault, but for ceton, twc customers would still be urinating up wind.
-
- Posts: 1761
- Joined: Fri Sep 07, 2012 3:43 pm
- Location:
- HTPC Specs:
Of whom maybe a dozen use CableCards and WMC.prijo wrote:I am only one small voice, twc probably has 750,000 subscribers in the greater Columbus area)
Even if it was 100 or 1,000, it's still not TWC's responsibility to fix WMC issues. Were TiVo users affected by this?
I posted a link to the Engineering Department of the station affected shortly before we got word that the issue had been resolved. It took less that two minutes to find that link on the stations website when I looked for it. At the time my suggestion was that users experiencing the problem should get the stations engineers on TWC's case, because when we were told that OTA recordings weren't effected, TWC seemed the obvious culprits. But if people had alerted the stations engineers when the problem first occurred, instead of contacting TWC, the issue might have been fixed sooner.
I'm not a TWC customer, I've got Verizon FiOS, and their customer service lines are infamous for ineptitude, so maybe I just have lower expectations than you do. But on the rare occasions when I've wandered into their online support forums, I've been pleasantly surprised to see interventions by knowledgeable and interested Verizon staff, acting in an unofficial capacity.Thank goodness for this forum and the level of support that ceton provides. Many have seen my setup, and everyone has asked if I can set one up for them. After this experience, I will give a 10 to ceton and recommend them 100%, time warner has been eliminated from the conversation.
Sure, this time it wasn't twc's fault, but for ceton, twc customers would still be urinating up wind.
-
- Posts: 1761
- Joined: Fri Sep 07, 2012 3:43 pm
- Location:
- HTPC Specs:
Hold on, you expect TWC to give you a straight answer about the behavior of 7MC, when we can't even get those answers from Microsoft?adam1991 wrote:Richard, I understand that. We all do at this point.
Please go back to *my* point on this: TWC would NOT have given ANY sort of "straight answer" to any caller on why 7MC is forbidden to record a show while TWC boxes happily record it.
That was my entire point here. Please go back and read immediately prior posts. I was disputing that the cableco would have given a "straight answer" to that very reasonable question.
TWC gave a straight answer, according to prijo:
prijo wrote:sorry, we cannot help you with your recording problems since you are not using a DVR supplied from time warner cable.
-
- Posts: 22
- Joined: Tue Apr 23, 2013 2:23 am
- Location:
- HTPC Specs:
Whatever foxwood , I guess it is just going to take a few more evolutionary cycles till my horse grows as tall as yours. I still believe, after all your spin that twc could/should have taken an interest in what myself and others have reported instead of dismissing us so quickly. In the end, it is my money I am sending to twc, not yours. You are allowed your opinion, likewise am I, no amount of quoting on you part will dissuade me from mine.
-
- Posts: 5
- Joined: Mon Apr 29, 2013 1:28 pm
- Location:
- HTPC Specs:
I'm on Insight as they are transitioning to TWC system. I tried to explain to the CSR over the phone that the CGMS flag was being set and if they could talk to NBC about fixing the broadcast flag or if TWC could set up the appropriate CCI flag to overide the CGMS flag for every channel in case something like this happens (much like they do on WOW's system). They were convinced that this was an isolated event and it was my cablecard failing. I said I'm 99% positive that wasn't the issue but if that is what it took to get a tech out to my house, so be it. That way I could show them this issue and educate them on the different broadcast flags so they could bring it back to their supervisors to implement a better fix in the system. Keep in mind the issue is fixed now but nothing else is stopping NBC or other broadcasters from upgrading equipment/software in the future and having this type of issue again. Isn't the better or more long term fix to implement the CCI copy freely or copy once so the CGMS copynever flag will be ignored?
-
- Posts: 1761
- Joined: Fri Sep 07, 2012 3:43 pm
- Location:
- HTPC Specs:
This wasn't an NBC issue, it was a WCMH issue. That's an important distinction that people seem to be avoiding. Contacting 30 Rockefeller Plaza would have done as much good as contacting TWC, because neither NBC nor TWC caused this problem or could do anything to fix it.lammers42 wrote:if they could talk to NBC about fixing the broadcast flag
WCMH provide a contact form for their engineering department right there on their website. Even if it had been a TWC problem, contacting the WCMH engineering team would have been the right place to start, if only because the kind of people who work in that kind of job tend to be passionate about it, and understand the kind of problems that arise. That's part of the reason that they tend to be paid a bit more than TWC Call Center Reps.
-
- Posts: 5
- Joined: Mon Apr 29, 2013 1:28 pm
- Location:
- HTPC Specs:
What is your problem man? Yeah I realize it was the local NBC affiliate that needed to be contacted. I'm sorry I didn't differentiate between local affiliate NBC and parent company NBC. However, I was more specifically talking about things TWC/Insight could do to fix the problem permanently regardless of whether WCMH or any other broadcaster attaches a CGMS copynever flag onto the broadcast.
-
- Posts: 1378
- Joined: Mon Aug 22, 2011 9:23 pm
- Location:
- HTPC Specs:
This is not the Broadcast Flag. That is another name for the Redistribution Control flag. This was CGMS-Alammers42 wrote:I'm on Insight as they are transitioning to TWC system. I tried to explain to the CSR over the phone that the CGMS flag was being set and if they could talk to NBC about fixing the broadcast flag or if TWC could set up the appropriate CCI flag to overide the CGMS flag for every channel in case something like this happens (much like they do on WOW's system). They were convinced that this was an isolated event and it was my cablecard failing. I said I'm 99% positive that wasn't the issue but if that is what it took to get a tech out to my house, so be it. That way I could show them this issue and educate them on the different broadcast flags so they could bring it back to their supervisors to implement a better fix in the system. Keep in mind the issue is fixed now but nothing else is stopping NBC or other broadcasters from upgrading equipment/software in the future and having this type of issue again. Isn't the better or more long term fix to implement the CCI copy freely or copy once so the CGMS copynever flag will be ignored?
Quality Assurance Manager, Ceton Corporation
-
- Posts: 5
- Joined: Mon Apr 29, 2013 1:28 pm
- Location:
- HTPC Specs:
It showed up on the HDhomerun Prime system as CGMS protection: protected copynever. I'm sorry I shortened it to CGMS copynever. Are you trying to say that if TWC would implement the proper CCI protection it wouldn't override any CGMS-A flag/bit/signal/whatever you want to call it? WOW does this and it works plain and simple. Everything I've ever read and saw in practice shows CCI will override CGMS-A.erkotz wrote:This is not the Broadcast Flag. That is another name for the Redistribution Control flag. This was CGMS-A
-
- Posts: 2623
- Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2011 3:15 am
- Location:
- HTPC Specs:
You referred to it as broadcast flag, which is very different from CGMS:
lammers42 wrote:I tried to explain to the CSR over the phone that the CGMS flag was being set and if they could talk to NBC about fixing the broadcast flag
lammers42 wrote:That way I could show them this issue and educate them on the different broadcast flags
-
- Posts: 1378
- Joined: Mon Aug 22, 2011 9:23 pm
- Location:
- HTPC Specs:
CCI does override CGMS-A (and RC) - my statement was because you referred to CGMS-A as the broadcast flag, which was incorrect.lammers42 wrote:It showed up on the HDhomerun Prime system as CGMS protection: protected copynever. I'm sorry I shortened it to CGMS copynever. Are you trying to say that if TWC would implement the proper CCI protection it wouldn't override any CGMS-A flag/bit/signal/whatever you want to call it? WOW does this and it works plain and simple. Everything I've ever read and saw in practice shows CCI will override CGMS-A.erkotz wrote:This is not the Broadcast Flag. That is another name for the Redistribution Control flag. This was CGMS-A
Quality Assurance Manager, Ceton Corporation
-
- Posts: 5738
- Joined: Tue Jun 21, 2011 7:23 pm
- Location: Titusville, Florida, USA
- HTPC Specs:
The poor horse. It's almost dead.
-
- Posts: 22
- Joined: Tue Apr 23, 2013 2:23 am
- Location:
- HTPC Specs:
nah, foxwood is still riding high on itbarnabas1969 wrote:The poor horse. It's almost dead.
-
- Posts: 5
- Joined: Mon Apr 29, 2013 1:28 pm
- Location:
- HTPC Specs:
Just so I know . . . in the future, what should I call the below CGMS-A "indicators" that are "not flags"?erkotz wrote:CCI does override CGMS-A (and RC) - my statement was because you referred to CGMS-A as the broadcast flag, which was incorrect.
00 CopyFreely
01 CopyNoMore
10 CopyOnce
11 CopyNever
-
- Posts: 2623
- Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2011 3:15 am
- Location:
- HTPC Specs:
I think the problem is you aren't realizing that "broadcast flag" is a specific kind of flag, as is CGMS-A. They are both flags, but they aren't the same flag. Read the two links I provided in post 115.